Re: [xs] notebook problem

["Ross McFarland" <rwmcfa1 neces com>]

> I think there is a need for Gtk2::Perlish.  Gtk2::Perlish would do things
> like the previous suggestion.  It would be written in pure Perl and would
> ride on top of Gtk2, like DBIx::Simple rides on top of DBI. This would let
> the bindings stay simple, the C people use the interface they are used to,
> and the Perl people use a slightly more friendly version.
>
> What do you think?

obviously there's nothing stopping people from doing such things. personally i
would prefer to have a complete (or reasonably so) c->perl mapping and then
consider the possiblility of such extensions. i wouldn't vote against putting
such things in the main modules where it's safe to do so. i would even be
willing to work on them, once everything else gets to some
stable/robust/full-featured point.

-rm