Re: Glade Perl codegen
- From: Emmanuele Bassi <bassi-e libero it>
- To: gtk-perl-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: Glade Perl codegen
- Date: Fri, 25 Mar 2005 16:52:31 +0100
Hi,
* Osmo Salomaa <otsaloma cc hut fi>:
It still could use some polishing (namely: a man page, some
documentation and an icon), though, but it's basically finished:
http://www.emmanuelebassi.net/linux/perl/gnome-hello-perl-0.3.tar.gz
Regards,
Emmanuele.
I am quite new to programming and I have never released an app before. I
might like to use gnome-hello-perl as a starting point. There's one
general question I'm wondering: What's the standard way to test your app
when writing the code, since the final product should have those @...@
path variables and doesn't run uncompiled. Should I just use absolute
pathnames while writing the code and manually edit before making a
releasable package?
My common practice is to create a sandbox, where I test the application.
Using autoconf, is simple: all I have to do is launch the configure
script with a user-writable directory as prefix:
./autogen.sh --prefix=/tmp/usr
If my app comes with a registered MIME type, or GConf schemas, I disable
those options, e.g.:
./autogen.sh \
> --prefix=/tmp/usr \
> --disable-schemas-install
At this point, I have a working sandbox where testing the correct
installation of files, the correct loading of modules/icons/data, etc.
Regards,
Emmanuele.
--
Emmanuele Bassi (Zefram) [ http://www.emmanuelebassi.net ]
GnuPG Key fingerprint = 4DD0 C90D 4070 F071 5738 08BD 8ECC DB8F A432 0FF4
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]