Re: [PATCH] Re: g_filename_display_name()
- From: Torsten Schoenfeld <kaffeetisch gmx de>
- To: gtk-perl-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: [PATCH] Re: g_filename_display_name()
- Date: Sun, 13 Nov 2005 19:36:13 +0100
On Sun, 2005-11-13 at 13:05 -0500, muppet wrote:
The attached patch adds Glib::filename_display_name() and
Glib::filename_display_basename() as exportable functions in HEAD.
There is no fallback implementation, so their presence is dependent
upon the bindings being built against glib 2.6.0. I'm not very fond
of this, but unless somebody has ideas about how to make a fallback
that will work without significant code duplication, i'm out of ideas.
Thoughts?
Same question. Good idea? Bad idea?
The patch looks good to me. Just a minor typo:
+This function is croak() if the conversion cannot be made, e.g., because the
+utf-8 is invalid.
I think you meant "will croak()".
--
Bye,
-Torsten
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]