[gtkmm] Gtkmm-forge digest, Vol 1 #241 - 2 msgs
- From: gtkmm-forge-request lists sourceforge net
- To: gtkmm-forge lists sourceforge net
- Subject: [gtkmm] Gtkmm-forge digest, Vol 1 #241 - 2 msgs
- Date: Tue, 01 Oct 2002 12:23:55 -0700
Send Gtkmm-forge mailing list submissions to
gtkmm-forge lists sourceforge net
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gtkmm-forge
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
gtkmm-forge-request lists sourceforge net
You can reach the person managing the list at
gtkmm-forge-admin lists sourceforge net
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of Gtkmm-forge digest..."
gtkmm-forge is the mailing list that receives gtkmm bug reports from bugzilla. A daily digest is sent to gtkmm-main, to encourage people to help fixing the bugs.
Today's Topics:
1. [Bug 94170] Changed - TreeModelColumns cannot be of type "UNSIGNED SHORT" (bugzilla-daemon widget gnome org)
2. [Bug 94170] Changed - TreeModelColumns cannot be of type "UNSIGNED SHORT" (bugzilla-daemon widget gnome org)
--__--__--
Message: 1
From: bugzilla-daemon widget gnome org
To: gtkmm-forge lists sourceforge net, webmaster nachtwind net
Cc:
Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2002 15:57:04 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: [gtkmm bugzilla] [Bug 94170] Changed - TreeModelColumns cannot be of type "UNSIGNED SHORT"
Please do not reply to this email- if you want to comment on the bug, go to the
URL shown below and enter your comments there.
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=94170
Changed by daniel elstner gmx net
--- shadow/94170 Mon Sep 30 08:12:56 2002
+++ shadow/94170.tmp.7168 Mon Sep 30 15:57:04 2002
@@ -1,13 +1,13 @@
Bug#: 94170
Product: gtkmm
Version: 2.0
OS: Linux
OS Details:
-Status: NEW
-Resolution:
+Status: RESOLVED
+Resolution: NOTABUG
Severity: normal
Priority: Normal
Component: TreeView
AssignedTo: gtkmm-forge lists sourceforge net
ReportedBy: webmaster nachtwind net
TargetMilestone: ---
@@ -146,6 +146,25 @@
to
myview.append_column_editable(...);
the code won't even compile.
+
+------- Additional Comments From daniel elstner gmx net 2002-09-30 15:57 -------
+This is a GLib problem -- there is no GValue implementation for
+"unsigned short". However, with gtkmm2 a custom GValue implementation
+is generated automatically and should work. You're getting this error
+message
+
+"GLib-GObject-WARNING **: unable to set property `text' of type
+`gchararray' from value of type `glibmm__CustomBoxed_Us'"
+
+because you'd have to set up your own cell_data_func callbacks -- GTK+
+doesn't know about the type.
+
+However, the reason why there's no GValue implementation for signed or
+unsigned short is that it wouldn't save you any space (GValue is
+padded up anyway) and rarely needed at all.
+
+--Daniel
+
--__--__--
Message: 2
From: bugzilla-daemon widget gnome org
To: gtkmm-forge lists sourceforge net, webmaster nachtwind net
Cc:
Date: Tue, 1 Oct 2002 02:54:36 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: [gtkmm bugzilla] [Bug 94170] Changed - TreeModelColumns cannot be of type "UNSIGNED SHORT"
Please do not reply to this email- if you want to comment on the bug, go to the
URL shown below and enter your comments there.
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=94170
Changed by webmaster nachtwind net
--- shadow/94170 Mon Sep 30 15:57:04 2002
+++ shadow/94170.tmp.5925 Tue Oct 1 02:54:36 2002
@@ -1,12 +1,12 @@
Bug#: 94170
Product: gtkmm
Version: 2.0
OS: Linux
OS Details:
-Status: RESOLVED
+Status: NEEDINFO
Resolution: NOTABUG
Severity: normal
Priority: Normal
Component: TreeView
AssignedTo: gtkmm-forge lists sourceforge net
ReportedBy: webmaster nachtwind net
@@ -165,6 +165,17 @@
However, the reason why there's no GValue implementation for signed or
unsigned short is that it wouldn't save you any space (GValue is
padded up anyway) and rarely needed at all.
--Daniel
+
+------- Additional Comments From webmaster nachtwind net 2002-10-01 02:54 -------
+Thank you, Daniel - but why is
+
++You're getting this error message
++ [...]
++because you'd have to set up your own cell_data_func callbacks --
++GTK+ doesn't know about the type.
+
+not true for the bool-type, for which a call_data_func_cb is also
+necessary?
--__--__--
_______________________________________________
Gtkmm-forge mailing list
Gtkmm-forge lists sourceforge net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gtkmm-forge
End of Gtkmm-forge Digest
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]