RE: [Re: [Re: [Re: [Re: [Re: [Re: [Re: [[gtkmm] technical questio n: GTKMM_LIFECYCLE]]]]]]]]

["Garriss, Michael" <Michael Garriss abacus-direct com>]

I'd also prefer an overloaded operator new.

-Mike

-----Original Message-----
From: Paul Davis [mailto:pbd op net]
Sent: Wednesday, October 02, 2002 11:47 AM
To: Murray Cumming
Cc: Martin Schulze; gtkmm-list
Subject: Re: [Re: [Re: [Re: [Re: [Re: [Re: [Re: [[gtkmm] technical
question: GTKMM_LIFECYCLE]]]]]]]] 


>> keep things like I have implemented them at the moment and recommend
>> users to write "Gst::RefPtr<Gst::Pad> my_pad = Gst::manage(new
Gst::Pad);"

something like:

   Gst::container_managed (new Gst::Pad);

might keep everyone happy. personally, i'd prefer an overloaded
operator new for Glib::Object:

	 enum ManagementStyle {
	      ExplicitlyManaged,
	      ContainerManaged
	      ...
         }	      

	 operator new (size_t, ManagementStyle style = ExplicitlyManaged);

allowing:

	new (Glib::ContainerManaged) Gst::Pad;

--p
_______________________________________________
gtkmm-list mailing list
gtkmm-list gnome org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtkmm-list