[gtkmm] Re: [Re: [gtkmm]
- From: ERDI Gergo <cactus cactus rulez org>
- To: Murray Cumming <murrayc usa net>
- Cc: Daniel Elstner <daniel elstner gmx net>, Christof Petig <christof petig-baender de>, Martin Schulze <MHL Schulze t-online de>, gtkmm-list gnome org
- Subject: [gtkmm] Re: [Re: [gtkmm]
- Date: Thu, 10 Oct 2002 22:30:26 +0200 (CEST)
On Thu, 10 Oct 2002, Murray Cumming wrote:
> This means nothing without test code to prove it. I belive that widgets and
> their containers respond to premature destruction, and that it's a GTK+ bug if
> they don't.
BTW, I use 'delete' to force widget destructions in lots of code and have
never seen a problem with it (with a forced refcounting scheme, you'd
only be able to 'unref' a widget and wouldn't be able to make sure it's
destroyed -- which is often what you want if you want to re-organize the
GUI)
--
.--= ULLA! =---------------------. `We are not here to give users what
\ http://cactus.rulez.org \ they want' -- RMS, at GUADEC 2001
`---= cactus cactus rulez org =---'
A statisztikák 43%-a használhatatlan.
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]