[gtkmm] Gtkmm-forge digest, Vol 1 #268 - 3 msgs

[gtkmm-forge-request lists sourceforge net]

Send Gtkmm-forge mailing list submissions to
	gtkmm-forge lists sourceforge net

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
	https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gtkmm-forge
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
	gtkmm-forge-request lists sourceforge net

You can reach the person managing the list at
	gtkmm-forge-admin lists sourceforge net

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of Gtkmm-forge digest..."


gtkmm-forge is the mailing list that receives gtkmm bug reports from bugzilla.  A daily digest is sent to gtkmm-main, to encourage people to help fixing the bugs.


Today's Topics:

   1. [Bug 90689] Changed - Patch to check for existence of 'dot' (bugzilla-daemon widget gnome org)
   2. [Bug 97036] Changed - API issues for pango methods (bugzilla-daemon widget gnome org)
   3. [Bug 97036] Changed - API issues for pango methods (bugzilla-daemon widget gnome org)

--__--__--

Message: 1
From: bugzilla-daemon widget gnome org
To: gtkmm-forge lists sourceforge net
Cc: 
Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2002 16:45:28 -0500 (EST)
Subject: [gtkmm bugzilla] [Bug 90689] Changed - Patch to check for existence of 'dot'

Please do not reply to this email- if you want to comment on the bug, go to the
URL shown below and enter your comments there.

http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=90689

Changed by btb debian org 

--- shadow/90689	Tue Oct 29 03:28:45 2002
+++ shadow/90689.tmp.14250	Tue Oct 29 16:45:28 2002
@@ -133,6 +133,9 @@
 Regards,
 Stephen
 
 ------- Additional Comments From murrayc usa net  2002-10-29 03:28 -------
 OK, so it looks like it's still best to distribute the built
 documentation. And we need a patch for that.
+
+------- Additional Comments From btb debian org  2002-10-29 16:45 -------
+I'll see what I can do.



--__--__--

Message: 2
From: bugzilla-daemon widget gnome org
To: gtkmm-forge lists sourceforge net, morus walter xipolis net
Cc: 
Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2002 05:27:09 -0500 (EST)
Subject: [gtkmm bugzilla] [Bug 97036] Changed - API issues for pango methods

Please do not reply to this email- if you want to comment on the bug, go to the
URL shown below and enter your comments there.

http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=97036

Changed by murrayc usa net 

--- shadow/97036	Mon Oct 28 14:25:23 2002
+++ shadow/97036.tmp.22183	Wed Oct 30 05:27:08 2002
@@ -47,6 +47,23 @@
 As Martin Schulze pointed out in the mailing list, I was wrong
 about the missing pango_shape wrapper.
 It's a shape mathod for Pango::Item.
 
 Sorry.
 Morus
+
+------- Additional Comments From murrayc usa net  2002-10-30 05:27 -------
+In
+
+void draw_glyphs (const Glib::RefPtr<const GC>& gc, 
+  const Glib::RefPtr<const Pango::Font>& font, int x, int y, 
+  PangoGlyphString* glyphs)
+
+The glyphs parameter is an _array_, not a single instance. The C
+documentation suggests that it's difficult to get such an array:
+http://developer.gnome.org/doc/API/2.0/gdk/gdk-drawing-primitives.html#gdk-draw-glyphs
+and says that this is a very low-level function.
+And this documentation is reused in gtkmm's reference docs:
+http://www.gtkmm.org/gtkmm2/docs/reference/html/classGdk_1_1Drawable.html#a19
+
+So, unless someone can suggest how it might be improved, I will close
+this bug.



--__--__--

Message: 3
From: bugzilla-daemon widget gnome org
To: gtkmm-forge lists sourceforge net, morus walter xipolis net
Cc: 
Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2002 10:58:50 -0500 (EST)
Subject: [gtkmm bugzilla] [Bug 97036] Changed - API issues for pango methods

Please do not reply to this email- if you want to comment on the bug, go to the
URL shown below and enter your comments there.

http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=97036

Changed by daniel elstner gmx net 

--- shadow/97036	Wed Oct 30 05:27:08 2002
+++ shadow/97036.tmp.19677	Wed Oct 30 10:58:50 2002
@@ -64,6 +64,30 @@
 and says that this is a very low-level function.
 And this documentation is reused in gtkmm's reference docs:
 http://www.gtkmm.org/gtkmm2/docs/reference/html/classGdk_1_1Drawable.html#a19
 
 So, unless someone can suggest how it might be improved, I will close
 this bug.
+
+------- Additional Comments From daniel elstner gmx net  2002-10-30 10:58 -------
+The documentation of gdk_draw_glyphs() sounds complicated, but it
+really isn't -- at least from a narrow-minded lets-wrap-this-function
+point of view ;)
+
+The glyphs parameter itself is _not_ an array.  What they probably
+mean is that PangoGlyphString contains an array of glyphs, just like a
+C-string really is an array of char.  But unlike char*,
+PangoGlyphString is a self-contained struct we don't have to know
+anything about in order to wrap it.
+
+It becomes clearer by looking at the PangoGlyphString docs:
+http://developer.gnome.org/doc/API/2.0/pango/pango-glyph-storage.html#PangoGlyphString
+
+From that you can see that the PangoGlyphString struct takes care of
+the array of glyphs.  So all we have to do is defining a
+Pango::GlyphString to PangoGlyphString* conversion (if it doesn't
+exists already) and use it in _WRAP_METHOD().  Business as usual.
+
+Well, one for 2.2.
+
+--Daniel
+




--__--__--

_______________________________________________
Gtkmm-forge mailing list
Gtkmm-forge lists sourceforge net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gtkmm-forge


End of Gtkmm-forge Digest