GNOME.org
 

[gtkmm] Gtkmm-forge digest, Vol 1 #425 - 17 msgs

Send Gtkmm-forge mailing list submissions to
	gtkmm-forge lists sourceforge net

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
	https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gtkmm-forge
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
	gtkmm-forge-request lists sourceforge net

You can reach the person managing the list at
	gtkmm-forge-admin lists sourceforge net

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of Gtkmm-forge digest..."


gtkmm-forge is the mailing list that receives gtkmm bug reports from bugzilla.  A daily digest is sent to gtkmm-main, to encourage people to help fixing the bugs.


Today's Topics:

   1. [Bug 111084] Changed - Deleted menu item's signal handler still called. (bugzilla-daemon widget gnome org)
   2. [Bug 111084] Changed - Deleted menu item's signal handler still called. (bugzilla-daemon widget gnome org)
   3. [Bug 112604] Changed - missing version numbers for bonobomm libraries (bugzilla-daemon widget gnome org)
   4. [Bug 112809] New - Add support for Visual Studio .NET 2003 (bugzilla-daemon widget gnome org)
   5. [Bug 112809] Changed - Add support for Visual Studio .NET 2003 (bugzilla-daemon widget gnome org)
   6. [Bug 112809] Changed - Add support for Visual Studio .NET 2003 (bugzilla-daemon widget gnome org)
   7. [Bug 112809] Changed - Add support for Visual Studio .NET 2003 (bugzilla-daemon widget gnome org)
   8. [Bug 109882] Changed - CH2 of the Gtkmm book does not include Windows installation (bugzilla-daemon widget gnome org)
   9. [Bug 112776] Changed - Support for Visual Studio .NET 2003 (bugzilla-daemon widget gnome org)
  10. [Bug 112809] Changed - Add support for Visual Studio .NET 2003 (bugzilla-daemon widget gnome org)
  11. [Bug 91410] Changed - Gtk::Menu: non-top-level top-level window. (bugzilla-daemon widget gnome org)
  12. [Bug 112776] Changed - Support for Visual Studio .NET 2003 (bugzilla-daemon widget gnome org)
  13. [Bug 112838] New - GnomeDateEdit widget construction bug (bugzilla-daemon widget gnome org)
  14. [Bug 112840] New - TextView color doesn't change with state (bugzilla-daemon widget gnome org)
  15. [Bug 112840] Changed - TextView color doesn't change with state (bugzilla-daemon widget gnome org)
  16. [Bug 112776] Changed - Support for Visual Studio .NET 2003 (bugzilla-daemon widget gnome org)
  17. [Bug 112840] Changed - TextView color doesn't change with state (bugzilla-daemon widget gnome org)

--__--__--

Message: 1
From: bugzilla-daemon widget gnome org
To: gtkmm-forge lists sourceforge net, pmazoy free fr
Cc: 
Date: Sun, 11 May 2003 15:29:42 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: [gtkmm bugzilla] [Bug 111084] Changed - Deleted menu item's signal handler still called.

Please do not reply to this email- if you want to comment on the bug, go to the
URL shown below and enter your comments there.

http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=111084

Changed by murrayc usa net 

--- shadow/111084	Thu May  8 13:49:36 2003
+++ shadow/111084.tmp.15974	Sun May 11 15:29:42 2003
@@ -1,13 +1,13 @@
 Bug#: 111084
 Product: gtkmm
 Version: 2.2
 OS: Windows
 OS Details: Windows 98, GTK+ 2.2.1.1, gtkmm 2.2.1
-Status: NEW   
-Resolution: 
+Status: RESOLVED   
+Resolution: FIXED
 Severity: normal
 Priority: Normal
 Component: general
 AssignedTo: gtkmm-forge lists sourceforge net                            
 ReportedBy: pmazoy free fr               
 TargetMilestone: ---
@@ -108,6 +108,18 @@
 ------- Additional Comments From murrayc usa net  2003-05-08 13:49 -------
 You were right - The MenuItem is not really being deleted. It's
 probably because something is referencing it but not unreferencing - a
 GTK+ bug, I suspect. We've seen and fixed similar bugs before. The
 next step is to to the same thing in GTK+ C code, and then, if the
 problem is still there, find out exactly what is refing/unrefing it.
+
+------- Additional Comments From murrayc usa net  2003-05-11 15:29 -------
+This should be fixed in cvs now:
+
+2003-05-09  Murray Cumming  <murrayc usa net>
+
+	* gtk/src/menushell.[hg|ccg] replace GP_LIST_CONTAINER_REMOVE() with
+	custom-written remove() and erase() MenuList methods, to ensure that
+	we unset the accel widget that we might have set in the MenuItem() 
+	constructor. This avoids a memory leak due to the extra reference.
+
+The attached old_accel_gtk.c shows what the problem was.



--__--__--

Message: 2
From: bugzilla-daemon widget gnome org
To: gtkmm-forge lists sourceforge net, pmazoy free fr
Cc: 
Date: Sun, 11 May 2003 15:30:22 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: [gtkmm bugzilla] [Bug 111084] Changed - Deleted menu item's signal handler still called.

Please do not reply to this email- if you want to comment on the bug, go to the
URL shown below and enter your comments there.

http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=111084

Changed by murrayc usa net 

--- shadow/111084	Sun May 11 15:29:42 2003
+++ shadow/111084.tmp.16494	Sun May 11 15:30:22 2003
@@ -120,6 +120,11 @@
 	* gtk/src/menushell.[hg|ccg] replace GP_LIST_CONTAINER_REMOVE() with
 	custom-written remove() and erase() MenuList methods, to ensure that
 	we unset the accel widget that we might have set in the MenuItem() 
 	constructor. This avoids a memory leak due to the extra reference.
 
 The attached old_accel_gtk.c shows what the problem was.
+
+------- Additional Comments From murrayc usa net  2003-05-11 15:30 -------
+Created an attachment (id=16433)
+old_accel_gtk.c
+



--__--__--

Message: 3
From: bugzilla-daemon widget gnome org
To: gtkmm-forge lists sourceforge net, btb debian org
Cc: 
Date: Sun, 11 May 2003 15:39:09 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: [gtkmm bugzilla] [Bug 112604] Changed - missing version numbers for bonobomm libraries

Please do not reply to this email- if you want to comment on the bug, go to the
URL shown below and enter your comments there.

http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=112604

Changed by murrayc usa net 

--- shadow/112604	Fri May  9 20:12:00 2003
+++ shadow/112604.tmp.21634	Sun May 11 15:39:09 2003
@@ -1,13 +1,13 @@
 Bug#: 112604
 Product: gnomemm
 Version: 2.0
 OS: All
 OS Details: 
-Status: NEW   
-Resolution: 
+Status: RESOLVED   
+Resolution: FIXED
 Severity: normal
 Priority: Normal
 Component: libbonobomm
 AssignedTo: gtkmm-forge lists sourceforge net                            
 ReportedBy: btb debian org               
 TargetMilestone: ---
@@ -27,6 +27,9 @@
 
 Does libbonobouimm have the same problem?
 
 ------- Additional Comments From btb debian org  2003-05-09 20:11 -------
 No, libbonobouimm is fine.
 
+
+------- Additional Comments From murrayc usa net  2003-05-11 15:39 -------
+Thanks a lot. Applied.



--__--__--

Message: 4
From: bugzilla-daemon widget gnome org
To: gtkmm-forge lists sourceforge net
Cc: 
Date: Mon, 12 May 2003 00:05:30 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: [gtkmm bugzilla] [Bug 112809] New - Add support for Visual Studio .NET 2003

Please do not reply to this email- if you want to comment on the bug, go to the
URL shown below and enter your comments there.

http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=112809

Changed by burrisj linkline com 

--- shadow/112809	Mon May 12 00:05:30 2003
+++ shadow/112809.tmp.23806	Mon May 12 00:05:30 2003
@@ -0,0 +1,17 @@
+Bug#: 112809
+Product: gtkmm
+Version: 2.2
+OS: Windows
+OS Details: 
+Status: NEW   
+Resolution: 
+Severity: normal
+Priority: Normal
+Component: build
+AssignedTo: gtkmm-forge lists sourceforge net                            
+ReportedBy: burrisj linkline com               
+TargetMilestone: ---
+URL: 
+Summary: Add support for Visual Studio .NET 2003
+
+This patch adds support for Visual Studio .NET 2003.



--__--__--

Message: 5
From: bugzilla-daemon widget gnome org
To: gtkmm-forge lists sourceforge net
Cc: 
Date: Mon, 12 May 2003 00:06:55 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: [gtkmm bugzilla] [Bug 112809] Changed - Add support for Visual Studio .NET 2003

Please do not reply to this email- if you want to comment on the bug, go to the
URL shown below and enter your comments there.

http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=112809

Changed by burrisj linkline com 

--- shadow/112809	Mon May 12 00:05:30 2003
+++ shadow/112809.tmp.24131	Mon May 12 00:06:55 2003
@@ -12,6 +12,11 @@
 ReportedBy: burrisj linkline com               
 TargetMilestone: ---
 URL: 
 Summary: Add support for Visual Studio .NET 2003
 
 This patch adds support for Visual Studio .NET 2003.
+
+------- Additional Comments From burrisj linkline com  2003-05-12 00:06 -------
+Created an attachment (id=16442)
+Patch to add support for Visual Studo .NET 2003
+



--__--__--

Message: 6
From: bugzilla-daemon widget gnome org
To: gtkmm-forge lists sourceforge net
Cc: 
Date: Mon, 12 May 2003 00:08:32 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: [gtkmm bugzilla] [Bug 112809] Changed - Add support for Visual Studio .NET 2003

Please do not reply to this email- if you want to comment on the bug, go to the
URL shown below and enter your comments there.

http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=112809

Changed by burrisj linkline com 

--- shadow/112809	Mon May 12 00:06:55 2003
+++ shadow/112809.tmp.24488	Mon May 12 00:08:32 2003
@@ -17,6 +17,11 @@
 This patch adds support for Visual Studio .NET 2003.
 
 ------- Additional Comments From burrisj linkline com  2003-05-12 00:06 -------
 Created an attachment (id=16442)
 Patch to add support for Visual Studo .NET 2003
 
+
+------- Additional Comments From burrisj linkline com  2003-05-12 00:08 -------
+Created an attachment (id=16443)
+project files for Visual Studio .NET 2003
+



--__--__--

Message: 7
From: bugzilla-daemon widget gnome org
To: gtkmm-forge lists sourceforge net, burrisj linkline com
Cc: 
Date: Mon, 12 May 2003 04:25:20 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: [gtkmm bugzilla] [Bug 112809] Changed - Add support for Visual Studio .NET 2003

Please do not reply to this email- if you want to comment on the bug, go to the
URL shown below and enter your comments there.

http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=112809

Changed by murrayc usa net 

--- shadow/112809	Mon May 12 00:08:32 2003
+++ shadow/112809.tmp.16198	Mon May 12 04:25:20 2003
@@ -22,6 +22,9 @@
 
 
 ------- Additional Comments From burrisj linkline com  2003-05-12 00:08 -------
 Created an attachment (id=16443)
 project files for Visual Studio .NET 2003
 
+
+------- Additional Comments From murrayc usa net  2003-05-12 04:25 -------
+Please close either this bug or bug 112776.



--__--__--

Message: 8
From: bugzilla-daemon widget gnome org
To: gtkmm-forge lists sourceforge net, gene erachampion com
Cc: 
Date: Mon, 12 May 2003 04:30:59 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: [gtkmm bugzilla] [Bug 109882] Changed - CH2 of the Gtkmm book does not include Windows installation

Please do not reply to this email- if you want to comment on the bug, go to the
URL shown below and enter your comments there.

http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=109882

Changed by murrayc usa net 

--- shadow/109882	Fri May  9 05:04:21 2003
+++ shadow/109882.tmp.18187	Mon May 12 04:30:59 2003
@@ -112,6 +112,15 @@
 ------- Additional Comments From cgustin ibelgique com  2003-05-09 05:04 -------
 I guess the easiest way would be to have the building stuff in the 
 xml file, with the link to the html file explicitly stated in 
 README.win32 (like 'see docs\tutorial\html\ape.htm' for details'). 
 Same thing for the symbols/objects/methods currently not available on 
 win32. The html doc is part of the source tarball anyway !
+
+------- Additional Comments From murrayc usa net  2003-05-12 04:30 -------
+Why do the building-gtkmm-on-windows need to be in the book, wherease
+the building-on-solaris README does not? It's easier to update the
+README than the book, so I'd prefer for the book to say "See the
+README". Likewise, the no-exported stuff - that needs to be easy to
+update.
+
+



--__--__--

Message: 9
From: bugzilla-daemon widget gnome org
To: gtkmm-forge lists sourceforge net, burrisj linkline com
Cc: 
Date: Mon, 12 May 2003 09:08:07 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: [gtkmm bugzilla] [Bug 112776] Changed - Support for Visual Studio .NET 2003

Please do not reply to this email- if you want to comment on the bug, go to the
URL shown below and enter your comments there.

http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=112776

Changed by murrayc usa net 

--- shadow/112776	Sun May 11 13:56:25 2003
+++ shadow/112776.tmp.3576	Mon May 12 09:08:07 2003
@@ -1,9 +1,9 @@
 Bug#: 112776
-Product: gtkmm
-Version: 2.2
+Product: libsigc++
+Version: 1.2
 OS: Windows
 OS Details: 
 Status: NEW   
 Resolution: 
 Severity: normal
 Priority: Normal
@@ -22,6 +22,9 @@
 
 
 ------- Additional Comments From burrisj linkline com  2003-05-11 13:56 -------
 Created an attachment (id=16431)
 Visual Studio .NET 2003 project files
 
+
+------- Additional Comments From murrayc usa net  2003-05-12 09:08 -------
+Reassigning to libsigc++, because that's what the patch seems to be for.



--__--__--

Message: 10
From: bugzilla-daemon widget gnome org
To: gtkmm-forge lists sourceforge net, burrisj linkline com
Cc: 
Date: Mon, 12 May 2003 09:09:06 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: [gtkmm bugzilla] [Bug 112809] Changed - Add support for Visual Studio .NET 2003

Please do not reply to this email- if you want to comment on the bug, go to the
URL shown below and enter your comments there.

http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=112809

Changed by murrayc usa net 

--- shadow/112809	Mon May 12 04:25:20 2003
+++ shadow/112809.tmp.4023	Mon May 12 09:09:06 2003
@@ -25,6 +25,13 @@
 Created an attachment (id=16443)
 project files for Visual Studio .NET 2003
 
 
 ------- Additional Comments From murrayc usa net  2003-05-12 04:25 -------
 Please close either this bug or bug 112776.
+
+------- Additional Comments From murrayc usa net  2003-05-12 09:09 -------
+Nevermind. I've noticed that the other patch is meant for libsigc++
+and reassigned it.
+
+The changes look good. I'll try to apply them in the next few days.
+Thanks.



--__--__--

Message: 11
From: bugzilla-daemon widget gnome org
To: gtkmm-forge lists sourceforge net, szombath bifab de
Cc: 
Date: Mon, 12 May 2003 09:24:07 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: [gtkmm bugzilla] [Bug 91410] Changed - Gtk::Menu: non-top-level top-level window.

Please do not reply to this email- if you want to comment on the bug, go to the
URL shown below and enter your comments there.

http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=91410

Changed by murrayc usa net 

--- shadow/91410	Mon Jan  6 17:52:08 2003
+++ shadow/91410.tmp.10924	Mon May 12 09:24:07 2003
@@ -184,6 +184,12 @@
 
 ------- Additional Comments From murrayc usa net  2002-11-10 17:23 -------
 This might be connected to the general bug described in #97729
 
 ------- Additional Comments From murrayc usa net  2003-01-06 17:52 -------
 No, it's not.
+
+------- Additional Comments From murrayc usa net  2003-05-12 09:24 -------
+I noticed recently that attempting to add a new GtkMenu to a container
+generates a warning because GtkMenu is already in a GtkWindow. It
+really is that simple. Maybe we can add a special "delete
+get_parent()" to the Gtk::Menu destructor.



--__--__--

Message: 12
From: bugzilla-daemon widget gnome org
To: gtkmm-forge lists sourceforge net, burrisj linkline com
Cc: 
Date: Mon, 12 May 2003 09:29:12 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: [gtkmm bugzilla] [Bug 112776] Changed - Support for Visual Studio .NET 2003

Please do not reply to this email- if you want to comment on the bug, go to the
URL shown below and enter your comments there.

http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=112776

Changed by murrayc usa net 

--- shadow/112776	Mon May 12 09:08:07 2003
+++ shadow/112776.tmp.13885	Mon May 12 09:29:12 2003
@@ -25,6 +25,10 @@
 Created an attachment (id=16431)
 Visual Studio .NET 2003 project files
 
 
 ------- Additional Comments From murrayc usa net  2003-05-12 09:08 -------
 Reassigning to libsigc++, because that's what the patch seems to be for.
+
+------- Additional Comments From murrayc usa net  2003-05-12 09:29 -------
+Please give me a filename for the Visual Studio project file. I would
+like to put this in a release in the next few days.



--__--__--

Message: 13
From: bugzilla-daemon widget gnome org
To: gtkmm-forge lists sourceforge net
Cc: 
Date: Mon, 12 May 2003 10:32:47 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: [gtkmm bugzilla] [Bug 112838] New - GnomeDateEdit widget construction bug

Please do not reply to this email- if you want to comment on the bug, go to the
URL shown below and enter your comments there.

http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=112838

Changed by liam nova-ioe org 

--- shadow/112838	Mon May 12 10:32:47 2003
+++ shadow/112838.tmp.14943	Mon May 12 10:32:47 2003
@@ -0,0 +1,49 @@
+Bug#: 112838
+Product: gnomemm
+Version: 2.0
+OS: Linux
+OS Details: RedHat 9.0
+Status: NEW   
+Resolution: 
+Severity: normal
+Priority: Normal
+Component: libgnomeuimm
+AssignedTo: gtkmm-forge lists sourceforge net                            
+ReportedBy: liam nova-ioe org               
+TargetMilestone: ---
+URL: 
+Summary: GnomeDateEdit widget construction bug
+
+Hi,
+
+I'm trying to use GnomeDateEdit (libgnomeuimm-1.3.16) in the following  code:-
+
+// get the time
+time_t the_time;
+time (&the_time);
+	
+// build the dateedit
+Gnome::UI::DateEdit* m_local_dateedit = Gtk::manage(new
+Gnome::UI::DateEdit(the_time, false, false));
+
+I'm getting the following warning when I create the object:-
+
+ glibmm-WARNING **: Glib::ConstructParams::ConstructParams(): object class
+`gtkmm__GnomeDateEdit' has no property named `the_time'
+
+The widget is then rendered incorrectly with a time edit box and when I set
+a date or time with it I get some more warnings:-
+
+GLib-CRITICAL **: file gdate.c: line 269 (g_date_get_month): assertion
+`g_date_valid (d)' failed
+ 
+(nova:12715): GLib-CRITICAL **: file gdate.c: line 284 (g_date_get_year):
+assertion `g_date_valid (d)' failed
+ 
+(nova:12715): GLib-CRITICAL **: file gdate.c: line 299 (g_date_get_day):
+assertion `g_date_valid (d)' failed
+
+I dont think this is a bug in my implementation, but maybe a problem in the
+ gnomeui wrapper ? 
+
+Thanks



--__--__--

Message: 14
From: bugzilla-daemon widget gnome org
To: gtkmm-forge lists sourceforge net
Cc: 
Date: Mon, 12 May 2003 10:45:08 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: [gtkmm bugzilla] [Bug 112840] New - TextView color doesn't change with state

Please do not reply to this email- if you want to comment on the bug, go to the
URL shown below and enter your comments there.

http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=112840

Changed by markus gerwinski de 

--- shadow/112840	Mon May 12 10:45:08 2003
+++ shadow/112840.tmp.22537	Mon May 12 10:45:08 2003
@@ -0,0 +1,22 @@
+Bug#: 112840
+Product: gtkmm
+Version: 2.2
+OS: Linux
+OS Details: 
+Status: NEW   
+Resolution: 
+Severity: normal
+Priority: Normal
+Component: general
+AssignedTo: gtkmm-forge lists sourceforge net                            
+ReportedBy: markus gerwinski de               
+TargetMilestone: ---
+URL: 
+Summary: TextView color doesn't change with state
+
+The background color of a TextView always remains the same, even if the
+"sensitive" property changes from true to false or vice versa:
+ - If the TextView was initialized in sensitive mode, it remains white even
+after changing to insensitive.
+ - If it was initialized in insensitive mode, it remains gray even after
+changing to sensitive.



--__--__--

Message: 15
From: bugzilla-daemon widget gnome org
To: gtkmm-forge lists sourceforge net, markus gerwinski de
Cc: 
Date: Mon, 12 May 2003 11:47:17 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: [gtkmm bugzilla] [Bug 112840] Changed - TextView color doesn't change with state

Please do not reply to this email- if you want to comment on the bug, go to the
URL shown below and enter your comments there.

http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=112840

Changed by murrayc usa net 

--- shadow/112840	Mon May 12 10:45:08 2003
+++ shadow/112840.tmp.19979	Mon May 12 11:47:17 2003
@@ -17,6 +17,11 @@
 The background color of a TextView always remains the same, even if the
 "sensitive" property changes from true to false or vice versa:
  - If the TextView was initialized in sensitive mode, it remains white even
 after changing to insensitive.
  - If it was initialized in insensitive mode, it remains gray even after
 changing to sensitive.
+
+------- Additional Comments From murrayc usa net  2003-05-12 11:47 -------
+Please show us a test case. I won't look at it before then, because I
+would have to build that test case, and you can do that as well as me.
+You might modify one of our examples to do this quickly.



--__--__--

Message: 16
From: bugzilla-daemon widget gnome org
To: gtkmm-forge lists sourceforge net, burrisj linkline com
Cc: 
Date: Mon, 12 May 2003 12:08:49 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: [gtkmm bugzilla] [Bug 112776] Changed - Support for Visual Studio .NET 2003

Please do not reply to this email- if you want to comment on the bug, go to the
URL shown below and enter your comments there.

http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=112776

Changed by murrayc usa net 

--- shadow/112776	Mon May 12 09:29:12 2003
+++ shadow/112776.tmp.30464	Mon May 12 12:08:49 2003
@@ -29,6 +29,14 @@
 ------- Additional Comments From murrayc usa net  2003-05-12 09:08 -------
 Reassigning to libsigc++, because that's what the patch seems to be for.
 
 ------- Additional Comments From murrayc usa net  2003-05-12 09:29 -------
 Please give me a filename for the Visual Studio project file. I would
 like to put this in a release in the next few days.
+
+------- Additional Comments From murrayc usa net  2003-05-12 12:08 -------
+Note that the project filename should probably be called
+MSVC/libsigc++_msvcX.something, next to the exising
+MSVC/libsigc++_msvc6.dsp. I guess the X would be 8 (if that's what
+they call it) or Net2003 or something.
+
+Please check that works.



--__--__--

Message: 17
From: bugzilla-daemon widget gnome org
To: gtkmm-forge lists sourceforge net
Cc: 
Date: Mon, 12 May 2003 14:37:55 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: [gtkmm bugzilla] [Bug 112840] Changed - TextView color doesn't change with state

Please do not reply to this email- if you want to comment on the bug, go to the
URL shown below and enter your comments there.

http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=112840

Changed by markus gerwinski de 

--- shadow/112840	Mon May 12 11:47:17 2003
+++ shadow/112840.tmp.16336	Mon May 12 14:37:55 2003
@@ -22,6 +22,11 @@
 changing to sensitive.
 
 ------- Additional Comments From murrayc usa net  2003-05-12 11:47 -------
 Please show us a test case. I won't look at it before then, because I
 would have to build that test case, and you can do that as well as me.
 You might modify one of our examples to do this quickly.
+
+------- Additional Comments From markus gerwinski de  2003-05-12 14:37 -------
+Created an attachment (id=16467)
+tar archive containing a simple test case
+




--__--__--

_______________________________________________
Gtkmm-forge mailing list
Gtkmm-forge lists sourceforge net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gtkmm-forge


End of Gtkmm-forge Digest
[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]