RE: [Re: [gtkmm] gcc-3.3 and gtkmm-2.2.1]
- From: "B. Bell" <bradleyb u washington edu>
- To: Murray Cumming Comneon com
- Cc: olau hardworking dk, <gtkmm-list gnome org>, <192482 bugs debian org>
- Subject: RE: [Re: [gtkmm] gcc-3.3 and gtkmm-2.2.1]
- Date: Sun, 18 May 2003 23:50:08 -0700 (PDT)
On Mon, 19 May 2003 Murray Cumming Comneon com wrote:
> > From: Ole Laursen [mailto:olau hardworking dk]
> > It's a bug.
> >
> > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2003-05/msg01686.html
> >
> > It will be fixed for 3.3.1, apparently. On
>
> Well done.
>
> > I fixed the problem for myself by installing GCC 3.2 again and forcing
> > the g++ symlink to point to g++-3.2 instead of g++-3.3. It's quite a
> > dirty hack, though. Else I don't quite know what to do. Perhaps the
> > Debian maintainer could insert "public:" in various places in the
> > headers to make it work for the Debian packages? Bradley, are you
> > reading this?
>
> If you are worried that the gcc bugfix release won't happen quickly enough,
> you could add a compiler check for that problem (you already have the test
> case) and added an ifdefed "public" to the sources, with a comment of
> course. There should be lots of examples of compiler checks in gtkmm
> already.
I won't be able to get to this until late monday, earlier if somebody
wants to send a patch.
-brad
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]