Re: [gtkmm] ANNOUNCE: gtkmm 2.2.2
- From: Igor Gorbounov <igorbounov voronezh serw ru>
- To: "Andrew E. Makeev" <andrew solvo ru>
- Cc: Murray Cumming Comneon com, gtkmm-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: [gtkmm] ANNOUNCE: gtkmm 2.2.2
- Date: Thu, 22 May 2003 13:06:45 +0400
Andrew E. Makeev wrote:
Murray Cumming Comneon com wrote:
From: Igor Gorbounov [mailto:igorbounov voronezh serw ru]
[...]
I guess, Igor has been building test samples just from gtkmm source
tarball, and their's Makefiles do not looking for gtkmm libraries with
"pkg-config --libs gtkmm-2.0" nor "-L${prefix}/lib -lgtkmm -latkmm
...", but just use libraries by relative paths from sources that just
has been built with configure/make.
Let him try "g++ -o test `pkg-config --cflags --libs gtkmm-2.0`
<sample_file>", and see what happens then.
No, here, at work, I have a stable working gtkmm-2.2.1.rpm. But
nevertheless, I didn't use
Makefiles from examples, I've just copied all text from an example about
drawing area (scribble
something) in a test GTK+ project in Anjuta - I was just wondering some
time ago if something
usefull may be done without gtkextra - and this test project made that
very error message,
Andrew was talking about.
As for me, it is a problem with gtkmm.spec file - now, when no *.so*
files are generated any more
the .spec file is no more relevant to this new package. I mean line 65
(%{_libdir}/*.so) and
line 57 (%{_libdir}/*.so.*) of a .spec file.
Uph, sorry for my poor English.
Igor Grobounov
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]