Re: [gtkmm] libglademm 2.1: get_widget_derived
- From: Reinhard Katzmann <suamor web de>
- To: gtkmm-list <gtkmm-list gnome org>
- Subject: Re: [gtkmm] libglademm 2.1: get_widget_derived
- Date: Tue, 2 Sep 2003 21:16:01 +0200
Hups, this should have gone to the list.
Hi Murray,
On Sat, Aug 30, 2003 at 03:09:04PM +0200, Murray Cumming wrote:
> On Sat, 2003-08-30 at 14:40, Reinhard Katzmann wrote:
> > - It does not compile properly on my system (libtool problems).
> > All so-extensions (didn't check static extensions) from the
> > shared libraries were missing.
>
> That's a familiar problem. Thanks for telling me. I'll make a new
> tarball in a couple of days.
Downloaded, but did not test it up to now.
> > There was no hint in NEWS or ChangeLog concerning the need
> > for newer build tools...
>
> These build tools are not needed unless you are autogen.sh-ing, for
> instance when you work from cvs.
Hmm, I just did a simple rebuild for a rpm file (mandrake). The
only thing I noticed that the script calls libtool --copy --force.
But this seems to be done for all rpm packages by default...
(%configure macro). The same worked for the old version released
in February. That's the reason why I thought that the this is
related to old libtool version on my system <-> new libtool included
with libglademm.
> > - The version cannot be checked. I tried to find "2.1" but
> > the version is still "2.0". It would be good to adapt the
> > Makefiles to use the new version or else I would have to
> > manually check for "get_widget_derived" in configure.in
>
> It works for me:
>
> $ pkg-config libglademm-2.0 --modversion
> 2.1.0
I do a
PKG_CHECK_MODULES(LIBGLADEMM2, libglademm-2.0,, exit)
Hmm, just read the man page. It seems I have todo
PKG_CHECK_MODULES(LIBGLADEMM2, libglademm-2.0 >= 2.1.0,, exit)
in my configure.in.
Will test this later...
> Notice that the name of the pkg-config file stays the same, because this
> will be API/ABI compatible with libglademm-2.0, with only API additions.
Yes, I noticed that to, because I can specify the API version in the
src.rpm file. So it was merely a syntactical problem ;-)
Regards,
Reinhard Katzmann
--
Software-Engineer, Developer for Embedded Devices
Project: Pertergrin - a RPG system - http://pertergrin.berlios.de
GnuPG Public Key available on request
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]