Re: [gtkmm] on_realize()!=signal_realize() ? , was: glade-2 + on_realize()

[Silviu D Minut <minutsil cse msu edu>]

They can. I have a

virtual bool on_window1_key_press() = 0;

implemented in a derived class, and it works. The only difference I see is
that this one returns a bool (as opposed to void). Should I set any mask
flag for the realize event?


> _Maybe_ signal handlers can not be pure virtual. But I would prefer
> someone to test that theory with another signal, in a simpler test case.
>
> On Mon, 2003-09-29 at 19:31, Silviu D Minut wrote:
> > > It's hard to know what your problem is. Is it even a compiler problem or
> > > a runtime problem?
> >
> > The code compiles fine. It's a runtime problem. Would it help if I
> > provided the my_application.glade file?
> >
> > I'm trying to make a handler for the realize signal, and it seems the
> > handler is not being called. Schematically, the situation is this:
> >
> > Gtk::Window
> >     |
> > window1_glade
> > 	virtual void on_realize_handler() = 0;
> >     |
> > window1
> >         void on_realize_handler() { cout << "Hello World" << endl; };
> >
> > When I run the application, the window shows but "Hello World" doesn't, so
> > I figure the handler is not being called.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > gtkmm-list mailing list
> > gtkmm-list gnome org
> > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtkmm-list
> --
> Murray Cumming
> murrayc usa net
> www.murrayc.com
>
>