Re: [gtkmm] gtkmm RPMs for Fedora Core 2; peless, please try it out.

[Julian Missig <julian jabber org>]

On 3 Jun, 2004, at 15:54, Murray Cumming wrote:

> On Thu, 2004-06-03 at 15:33 -0400, Julian Missig wrote:
> > On 3 Jun, 2004, at 15:23, Murray Cumming wrote:
> >
> > > On Thu, 2004-06-03 at 15:10 -0400, Julian Missig wrote:
> > >
> > > > I don't disagree that the Fedora people are the appropriate ones to
> > > > talk to, I've done so on several occasions. Quite a few of them are
> > > > still of the opinion that as a general rule they don't like to 
> > > > include
> > > > libraries if they're not including an app which depends on them. We
> > > > need to keep pushing them to get gtkmm including in the Official
> > > > repository.
> > >
> > > No, as I understand it, they just haven't completed the merge yet. 
> > > The
> > > merge will make this issue irrelevant, or you'll be arguing about 
> > > what
> > > goes on the CD/DVDs instead. It should then be equivalent to debian,
> > > which does not have this problem.
> >
> > Oh, well, then, why all this arguing? Since you're always right about
> > this stuff then we just need to wait and gtkmm will be in official
> > Fedora Core in no time!
>
> No, people need to talk to Fedora about Fedora. It should be quite
> obvious that bugging me about it is a waste of time. It's not that I
> don't want to tell you how to get RPMs for Fedora, but I don't know, 
> and
> it doesn't matter how much people insist that I should tell them.
>
> Based on your gabber experiences, you know full well the danger of
> telling people to use 3rd party RPMs.

My problem is you acting like there are official gtkmm RPMs for Fedora 
*at all*.

There are not.

Julian