Re: [sigc] Re: [gtkmm] libsigcx and gtkmm 2.4
- From: Paul Davis <paul linuxaudiosystems com>
- To: Martin Schulze <martin-ml hippogriff de>
- Cc: libsigcx-main lists sourceforge net, libsigc-list gnome org, Gtkmm List <gtkmm-list gnome org>, Christer Palm <palm nogui se>, Daniel Elstner <daniel elstner gmx net>
- Subject: Re: [sigc] Re: [gtkmm] libsigcx and gtkmm 2.4
- Date: Mon, 14 Jun 2004 09:02:42 -0400
> m... after reading:
>
> http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/libstdc++/faq/#5_6
>
>I still cannot answer the question whether string (in the example from
>above) _is_ thread-safe?!
std::string can never be considered thread safe.
it is possible that some specific implementations of std::string are
thread safe, either by design or by accident, but you should never
assume this.
std::string instances may share references to a common data
buffer. multiple threads may be operating on multiple instances of
std::string's which happen to share the data buffer. there is no
interlocking, no mutexes and absolutely no memory barrier that
controls these interactions. consider:
std::string foo = "foobar;
std::string bar = foo;
// foo and bar both use the same data buffer
thread 1 thread 2
======== ========
foo[0] = 's';
// buffer holds soobar
if (bar[0] == 'f')
instant race condition if the implementation of std::string is devoid
of mutexes. depending on the execution order of the two threads,
thread 2 may mor may take a particular branch based on the first
character of the string.
designing thread safe data structures is tricky. std::string has never
been intended to have these semantics, and its quite difficult to add
them. the simplest approach is to use mutex protected copy-on-write,
but even that has complications.
if you need a thread safe string class, you will need to implement
your own or find one on the net (i have never looked, but i imagine
one might exist).
--p
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]