Re: libglademm and signal autoconnect (implemented)

[Stas Sergeev <stsp aknet ru>]

Hello.

Murray Cumming wrote:
> As I've just mentioned in the bug report, I don't find it acceptable to
> hard-code references to every widget's signals in libglademm (or
> Gtk::Builder). Not only would that be a massive list for all of gtkmm's
> objects, which we'd have to keep up-to-date, but that list could not
> contain signals for objects/widgets that are not part of gtkmm, such as
> gtksourceviewmm or libgnomedbmm.
There is a new patch at the tracker
for some time now, that addresses
this and your other concern about
hacking around the libglade's private
structures.
In fact, it is now just a tiny wrapper
around the gtk_builder_connect_signals_full(),
which is probably the best way of
implementing that.
Have you happened to take a look?
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=573482