Re: cluttermm: no effects?

From: Aarto Matti <aarto matti gmail com>
To: Daniel Elstner <daniel kitta googlemail com>
Cc: Krzesimir Nowak <qdlacz gmail com>, gtkmm-list gnome org
Subject: Re: cluttermm: no effects?
Date: Fri, 2 Oct 2009 11:57:26 +0300

On Fri, Oct 2, 2009 at 1:37 AM, Daniel Elstner <daniel kitta googlemail com> wrote:

Eeek, it's a bad idea to have that in the API. Glib::ValueBase and the
Glib::Value<> specializations are part of the internal infrastructure of
the C++ bindings. It was never intended to be directly exposed in our
API

Hi,
I was really really scarred to use Glib::ValueBase. It turns out that I have to use C interface for such things, so I did. Can't wait when animate() gets a better declaration. Thanks for elaborating!

--
Aarto

References:
- Re: cluttermm: no effects?
  - From: Daniel Elstner

[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]