Re: gtkmm 2.18 Windows installer?

[Mark Roberts <gtkmm manumark de>]

On Thu, 22 Oct 2009, Murray Cumming wrote:

> It sounds like a gtkmm 2.18 installer would indeed be useful, and it
> sounds like Tor should be encouraged to do a GTK+ installer. That would
> mean that we all had the same stuff to work with, so we could get some
> real information about those bugs.

Mark Roberts wrote:

> We don't want someone new using it and then abandoning gtk on the 
> grounds that it's buggy. [...]

The installer would have to be marked as "instable" or "buggy" or "beta" 
or something. That way we can follow up the remaining bugs without letting 
people stumble over it that were looking for pre-packaged, great, 
100%-bugfree software.

Mark