Re: glibmm ABI name for gtkmm 3

[Murray Cumming <murrayc murrayc com>]

On Thu, 2010-05-20 at 10:37 -0400, José Alburquerque wrote:
> On Thu, 2010-05-20 at 11:07 +0200, Murray Cumming wrote:
> > At the moment, I think we will just break glibmm ABI at a particular
> > glibmm version and not attempt to wrap that version of glib for both
> > glibmm ABIs.
> > 
> > The current glib is 2.24. The next one will be glib 2.26, probably
> > within 6 months. I suggest that glibmm 2.26 will wrap glib 2.6, without
> > breaking ABI.
> > 
> > Then glibmm 2.28 would break ABI and wrap glib 2.8.
> > 
> > I think it's wroth waiting until glib 2.28 because I don't believe that
> > GTK+ 3.0.0 (or GNOME 3) will be done within six months. But that's not
> > the official GTK+ or GNOME opinion. If I am wrong then we can quickly
> > adapt.
> > 
> > In the meantime, so we can start work in a branch, we need some
> > temporary ABI name that is obviously not something to consider stable. I
> > suggest glibmm-2.26maybe . 
> 
> I just saw this post.  Does that mean that wrapping GSettings should
> wait until a new branch?

No, there's no reason to wait.

>   Also, I'm willing to take some time and wrap
> some things that might not be wrapped, but only if no one else is
> working on that already.
> 


-- 
murrayc murrayc com
www.murrayc.com
www.openismus.com