Re: Gtk::Application punted to gtkmm 3.2
- From: Murray Cumming <murrayc murrayc com>
- To: gtkmm-list <gtkmm-list gnome org>
- Subject: Re: Gtk::Application punted to gtkmm 3.2
- Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2011 09:57:27 +0200
On Thu, 2011-03-24 at 10:21 +0100, Murray Cumming wrote:
> On Wed, 2011-03-23 at 16:17 +0100, Murray Cumming wrote:
> > We should freeze the gtkmm API in the next day or so, to be roughly in
> > sync with the GNOME 3.0 schedule. Gtk::Application still isn't ready so
> > I have removed it for now. Hopefully we can figure things out and add it
> > for gtkmm 3.2. This is the gtkmm bug about it:
> > http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=637445#c17
> >
> > This commit removes it, which can be reverted later:
> > http://git.gnome.org/browse/gtkmm/commit/?id=83f5d5f1ab792ff823d5748265907be97e422aea
> >
> > And the code is still in this branch:
> > http://git.gnome.org/browse/gtkmm/log/?h=gtkapplication
> >
> > As far as I can tell nobody was using Gtk::Application in gtkmm yet,
> > though I guess people will start to want it once GNOME 3.0 is out.
>
> I doubt that Gio::Application will be used without Gtk::Application, so
> I will also temporarily remove Gio::Application and Gio::ActionGroup
> from glibmm too. That removes the risk that we would need to change
> their API too after declaring it stable.
We have made some progress with this since adding it back recently, but
I think we need to remove it again so we can get gtkmm 3.2 out in time
for GNOME 3.2 this week:
https://live.gnome.org/ThreePointOne
It feels close to finished, but it would be risky to assume that its
API/ABI is ready before testing it in a real application.
--
murrayc murrayc com
www.murrayc.com
www.openismus.com
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]