Re: gtkmm 3.24 or new API in gtkmm 3.22?

[Daniel Boles <dboles src gmail com>]

On 5 April 2017 at 15:00, Murray Cumming <murrayc murrayc com> wrote:

On Sat, 2017-04-01 at 09:22 +0200, Kjell Ahlstedt wrote:
> I agree with Diether and Daniel: Let's do as gtk+ does, even though
> they break the rules.

OK. Then I don't object anymore. Thanks for being patient. Feel free to
add API in the gtkmm-3-22 branch:
https://git.gnome.org/browse/gtkmm/log/?h=gtkmm-3-22

Is the recently created glibmm-2-52 branch intended as an API-breaking/adding (within limits of what the C lib does) wrapper of GLib 2.50? Maybe then, based on this decision, that stuff should just be put in glibmm-2-50 anyway?