Re: define-struct
- From: Andrei Zmievski <andrei ispi net>
- To: James Henstridge <james daa com au>
- Cc: Mike Kestner <mkestner speakeasy net>, language-bindings <language-bindings gnome org>
- Subject: Re: define-struct
- Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2001 09:13:34 -0600
On Thu, 13 Dec 2001, James Henstridge wrote:
> With the new defs format, I am mainly thinking about gtk 2.0. With 2.0,
> GdkPixbuf is a GObject.
>
> For gdk-pixbuf-0.x releases (the current versions for use with gtk 1.2),
> it should fall under the boxed type category (the ref/unref functions
> correspond to the copy/free of a boxed type). Unfortuately, it isn't
> registered with the typesystem as such :(
I see. What about structs that are not registered as derivatives of
G_TYPE_POINTER or GObject, but still need to be exposed? Are there any?
-Andrei
"In My Egotistical Opinion, most people's C programs should be indented
six feet downward and covered with dirt." -- Blair P. Houghton
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]