Re: define-struct
- From: Andrei Zmievski <andrei ispi net>
 
- To: James Henstridge <james daa com au>
 
- Cc: Mike Kestner <mkestner speakeasy net>,	language-bindings <language-bindings gnome org>
 
- Subject: Re: define-struct
 
- Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2001 09:13:34 -0600
 
On Thu, 13 Dec 2001, James Henstridge wrote:
> With the new defs format, I am mainly thinking about gtk 2.0.  With 2.0, 
> GdkPixbuf is a GObject.
> 
> For gdk-pixbuf-0.x releases (the current versions for use with gtk 1.2), 
> it should fall under the boxed type category (the ref/unref functions 
> correspond to the copy/free of a boxed type).  Unfortuately, it isn't 
> registered with the typesystem as such :(
I see. What about structs that are not registered as derivatives of
G_TYPE_POINTER or GObject, but still need to be exposed? Are there any?
-Andrei
"In My Egotistical Opinion, most people's C programs should be indented
six feet downward and covered with dirt." -- Blair P. Houghton
[
Date Prev][
Date Next]   [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]   
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]