gtk2-perl
- From: muppet <scott asofyet org>
- To: language-bindings gnome org
- Subject: gtk2-perl
- Date: Sat, 16 Aug 2003 01:11:53 -0400
saw you had us listed on the language bindings page. that's pretty
cool. :-)
thought you might like to know that we're expecting to hit 1.0 in the
next couple of weeks.
for your status grid, we don't support 1.2 at all, develop mainly
against 2.0 and have lots of stuff to support 2.2. i haven't heard
anything about 2.4.
what do you consider "complete" versus "almost complete"? i consider
2.0 to be "complete", but we leave out quite a few functions
intentionally, and others are left out simply because we either can't
figure out what they do or if they are actually needed for app
developers. is there a criterion by which we should be going? is
there a currently-maintained gtk.defs file that could've saved us two
months of development?
also --- what does it take to become an "official" binding? certainly
perl should be on that list if python is. ;-)
--
muppet <scott at asofyet dot org>
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]