RE: A GNOME Bindings release set?

[Murray Cumming Comneon com]

> So, according to
> "
> instead, we use a scheme that is similar in spirit (although it does 
> not exactly match the traditional perl versioning scheme).  
> basically, 
> x.yyz, where x is the major, yy is the minor (even for stable), and z 
> is the micro, and is often omitted when 0.
> "
> 
> Will these become Gtk2-2.400, for the final GNOME 2.6 
> release, and Gtk2-2.401, Gtk2-2.402 for stable releases after that?
> 
> > Gtk2-GladeXML-x.xxx.tar.gz
> > Gnome2-Canvas -x.xxx.tar.gz
> > Gnome2-GConf -x.xxx.tar.gz
> > Gnome2-VFS -x.xxx.tar.gz
> > Gnome2-x.xxx.tar.gz

Also, is it impossible to put the word "perl" in those tarball names? It
would be nice to avoid confusion if we have tarballs from other bindings
with similar names. But I understand if perl does not allow you to do that.

Murray Cumming
www.murrayc.com
murrayc usa net