Re: Ch binding to GTK+
- From: murrayc t-online de (Murray Cumming)
- To: "Wayne W. Cheng" <wcheng softintegration com>
- Cc: jamesh <james daa com au>, "language-bindings gnome org" <language-bindings gnome org>
- Subject: Re: Ch binding to GTK+
- Date: 15 Jan 2003 17:07:32 +0100
On Wed, 2003-01-15 at 02:35, Wayne W. Cheng wrote:
> Hi James,
>
> >
> > Murray or me can add the binding to the website.
>
> Thank you very much.
>
> If you can add a link to C/C++ interpreter binding. Can you please use
> "Ch (C/C++ Interpreter) binding to GTK+" ?
>
> > One of the reasons for
> > delay is that you are the first person to request a link to a
> > proprietary language binding.
>
> Our C/C++ interpreter called Ch is not a a proprietary language.
I think he meant proprietary "language binding", not "proprietary
language" binding.
> The binary is the original one
> without any modification downloaded from from sourceForge.
> We will remove the distribution of GTK lib once it is
> included in all distirbution of Linux by all vendors.
> Or it has already been included by default?
>
> > It is not enough to
> > provide sources on request without telling the recipient that they
> > can
> > ask for sources.
>
> We have modified the license and have told the recipients that they
> can ask for GTK 1.2 source code if they are interested.
Good. This might be enough.
But I have just downloaded a new copy of
chgtk-3.0.0.linux2.2.5.intel.tar.gz and I still see the "3. No
Modification of Licensed Software.". Maybe you should show us your
intended license online or as an attachment.
> > You
> > could either provide a tarball containing the modified sources, or
> > the
> > original tarball accompanied by a patch including your changes.
>
> We only modified header files for interpretive execution of Ch
> at run time. They are already included as open source in our
> distribution.
I have not looked at them because I can not do that without installing
the binary. It might be OK. After we have seen the license I will
forward the details to Owen Taylor, who is more of an expert.
It would probably be a good idea to submit your patches to GTK+ to avoid
the need to fork the project for Ch.
Again, I don't mean to make your life difficult. It's obvious that you
want to do the right thing.
--
Murray Cumming
murray usa net
www.murrayc.com
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]