Re: No GTK+ 2.6 in GNOME 2.8

["muppet" <scott asofyet org>]

Murray Cumming said:
> On Tue, 2004-04-20 at 12:23, Murray Cumming wrote:
>> Hmm, this is awkward, but hopefully you will not need to add
>> much API if there is no new GTK+ API. And the perl bindings
>
> I meant to say "And the perl bindings are not using 2.4.x version
> numbers, so maybe they have more room to maneuver."

We will likely make use of this, with a 1.06x stable series that adds things
we punted for the freeze, and other stuff which has been uncovered with the
influx of new users spurred by the big release announcements.


-- 
muppet <scott at asofyet dot org>