Re: GNOME Platform Bindings - first schedule date
- From: muppet <scott asofyet org>
- To: Murray Cumming Comneon com
- Cc: language-bindings gnome org
- Subject: Re: GNOME Platform Bindings - first schedule date
- Date: Tue, 6 Jan 2004 11:21:21 -0500
On Tuesday, January 6, 2004, at 03:04 AM, Murray Cumming Comneon com
wrote:
1. It would be nice if you used GTK+ 2.3- and GNOME 2.5-like version
numbers:
http://developer.gnome.org/dotplan/bindings>
/rules.html#VersionNumbers
as discussed before, we can't use 3-part version numbers for a
variety of reasons, all perl-related.
OK. Do you have any way to indicate API stability/addition with
version numbers? Can you tell me
- what version numbers you will use for your GNOME Platform Bindins
2.6.0 releases, for your libgnomeui binding, for instance?
- what version numbers you will use for your GNOME Platform Bindins
2.7.x and 2.8.0 releases, for your libgnomeui binding, for instance?
i can't tell you right now what those versions will be for GNOME 2.8
--- but there are no API additions in our stable series, and we retain
as much backwards-compatibility as possible. for example, you can
compile the current stable release of the Gtk2 module against any
currently existing stable release of gtk+-2.0.
but, for our stable series (even yy in x.yyz), there will be no API
additions, only bugfixes. a new stable series may add API. e.g., no
new functions will make it into Gtk2-1.02x, but will be available in
Gtk2-1.04x. in fact, we're waiting impatiently for gtk+'s api freeze...
the current plan is to have 1.00x of Gnome2 and friends ready for the
GNOME 2.6.0 release; they are currently in 0.9x beta series.
--
"it's hard to be eventful when you have this much style."
- me, rationalizing yet another night of sitting at home.
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]