[sigc] Re: test tarball: libsigc++ 2.0.6 (test1)



I only did
  ./configure
  make

I probably misread the log, I did the build quickly, in the middle of a few other tasks. I'm not a great multi-tasker.
If the log says it is okay, it must be okay.

martin-ml hippogriff de wrote:
Mmm, I swore I attached it to the email.
Definitely attached now.

----- Original Message -----
From: martin-ml hippogriff de
Date: Monday, October 4, 2004 5:45 pm
Subject: Re: test tarball: libsigc++ 2.0.6 (test1)


Failed on Solaris 10 sparc.


Where exactly do you see the problem?
According to the make log attached there is only a warning generated for
some test cases but the build went through. Do you have problems running
the test cases?

Regards,

  Martin


Could you send me the output of make, please?

Thanks!

Martin


----- Original Message -----
From: Martin Schulze <martin-ml hippogriff de>
Date: Saturday, October 2, 2004 8:28 pm
Subject: test tarball: libsigc++ 2.0.6 (test1)


Hi!

After solving some critical bugs we need to submit a new release

ASAP.>> Please check whether the following tarball works for your
environment:>>

http://www.hippogriff.de/libsigc++-2.0.6-test1.tar.gz

Changes:

* Compiles with gcc-3.4.
* Fixed a memory leak.
* When compiled with MSVC .Net 2003 move all calls to new
and delete into non-inline library code (fixes segfaults).
* In the compatibility module use correct bound_mem_functor
variants for const (volatile) methods when creating a slot.
* Minor documentation fix.
* Resolved bugs: #152327 #148744 #152323 #151404 #153143

Thanks!

Martin






--
Damien Carbery
Desktop Release Engineer
Sun Microsystems

Email: damien carbery sun com
Ph: +353 1 819-9218
Ext: x 19218

Dublin Bus and Irish Rail timetables for your Palm:
http://bussched.sourceforge.net



[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]