Re: [sigc] Re: [Boost-users] Signals & Slots
- From: Murray Cumming <murrayc murrayc com>
- To: Carl Nygard <cjnygard fast net>
- Cc: libsigc++ list <libsigc-list gnome org>, boost-users lists boost org
- Subject: Re: [sigc] Re: [Boost-users] Signals & Slots
- Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2005 13:30:14 +0200
On Fri, 2005-01-07 at 12:12 +0100, Murray Cumming wrote:
> On Mon, 2004-11-22 at 01:00 -0500, Carl Nygard wrote:
> > http://www.3sinc.com/opensource/boost.bind-vs-sigc2.html
> [snip]
> > Docs updated.
> [snip]
>
> I thought I'd review this again, because I lost track of what changes
> were made.
>
> 1. In several cases, you show
> sig.connect(&Func);
> but show
> sig.connect(sigc::ptr_fun(&Func));
> for the libsigc++ example.
>
> But I believe (Am I correct, Martin?) that sig.connect(&Func) will work
> with both APIs, and I believe that boost has a ptr_fun() too. It does
> not seem to be an API difference.
>
> 2. In "Automatic disconnection",
> the use of operator() instead of a normal method will just cause
> confusion.
>
> 3. In "Slot Binders"
> Can you expand on this question: "TODO: answer questions: a) What's up
> with the No Clue entry, anyone?", please. In fact, please just ask your
> TODO questions on this mailing list.
>
> 4. Some of the "-ed" comments seem outdated now. It would be nice to
> clean these up.
Carl, could you please make these changes. It would be very helpful.
--
Murray Cumming
murrayc murrayc com
www.murrayc.com
www.openismus.com
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]