Re: [libxml++] (Another) example segfault

[Murray Cumming <murrayc murrayc com>]

On Thu, 2005-11-17 at 12:03 -0600, Frederick Heckel wrote:
> Wow, go me. It's been a long week, and I wrote the wrong thing.. :)
> 
> I am, in fact, running Debian testing on that system. In fact, I have no problems
> on the Debian stable systems which are most important for the software. But it'd be nicer
> to develop on my workstation, and this is an issue that will come up eventually anyway.
> Is there any particular trick for use on a testing system, which does apparently use g++ 4.0 (as 
> compiling with g++ 3.3 does give the libstdc++ warning, but results in a different 
> error, and g++ 3.4 gives the same results as 4.0)?

You can't mix g++ 3.3 and 4.0, ever. I think that 3.4 and 4.0 _might_ be
ABI compatible.

But the libsigc++ supplied by your debian distribution should be
compiled with the same C++ compiler that your debian distribution
supplies by default. So if it's not working, this is probably a debian
bug. If you submit a bug, please do mention the link here.

Personally, I think debian testing is only for testing, which means
finding bugs.

-- 
Murray Cumming
murrayc murrayc com
www.murrayc.com
www.openismus.com