Re: [Nautilus-list] Re: nautilus build sucks.
- From: t0ny dE almEida lOpes <someone sonic net>
- To: Miguel de Icaza <miguel helixcode com>
- Cc: Martijn van Beers <martijn earthling net>, Mathieu Lacage <lacage email enst fr>, nautilus-list lists eazel com, gnome-hackers gnome org
- Subject: Re: [Nautilus-list] Re: nautilus build sucks.
- Date: Tue, 6 Jun 2000 17:13:01 +0000
Well as you might have read in my prior post, I'm having a ton of problems with
the M4 macros? I really don't know that much about them at all. Are they related
to the AM_ macros? If so how do I properly set them up so that the autogen.sh
and configure will work properly.
And I have to say I agree with you Miguel, the gnome-config way is MUCH more
effective than all this runaround with AM_ stuff.
So if you can tell me which packages to install where and what env-vars to set
up, I think I can do this.
t0ny
On Mon, 05 Jun 2000 17:57:19 Miguel de Icaza wrote:
>
> > As I told mathieu on irc, the new gnome.m4 that will be available
> > with gnome-libs 2 (and if you use hack-macros instead of macros)
> > solves this by allowing you to include gnome-config modules in
> > the AM_PATH_GNOME macro call.
>
> I hate the AM_ macros so much, that I want to see them all dead.
>
> The proper way of testing for GNOME or other libraries is obviously
> trough the gnome-config script and the use of the --modversion flag.
>
> Miguel.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Nautilus-list mailing list
> Nautilus-list lists eazel com
> http://www.eazel.com/mailman/listinfo/nautilus-list
>
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]