[Nautilus-list] POSIXly Nautilus (was Re: Integration of gmc and nautilus desktop directories)
- From: Cesar Cardoso <cesarcardoso skydome net>
- To: Ian McKellar <ian eazel com>
- Cc: Nautilus-list <nautilus-list lists eazel com>
- Subject: [Nautilus-list] POSIXly Nautilus (was Re: Integration of gmc and nautilus desktop directories)
- Date: 13 Apr 2001 20:29:24 -0300
Em 13 Apr 2001 16:22:59 -0700, Ian McKellar escreveu:
> On Fri, Apr 13, 2001 at 08:15:24PM -0300, Cesar Cardoso wrote:
> > Em 13 Apr 2001 15:56:43 -0700, Ian McKellar escreveu:
> >
> > > > > I mean, name a platform that *isn't* POSIX compliant!
> > > > >
> > > > I can only remember Windows 9x/ME.
> > >
> > > But Win2k has a POSIX layer (afaik), and MS is phasing out the old DOS based
> > > platforms.
> > >
> > NT was certified as POSIX compliant, AFAIK. Way before 2K :-)
>
> A friend of mine likes to point out that the first two operating systems to
> be certified POSIX compliant weren't UNIXes, but VMS and some IBM mainframe
> OS ;-)
Hm.
So, if all OS in the market are POSIX-compliant, and Nautilus can be
ported to any POSIX-compliant system...
...someone can port Nautilus to MacOS X or Windows XP, right? ;-)
--
---
Cesar Cardoso - cesarcardoso ig com br - ICQ 32237133
"MOVE 'ZIG'!!! FOR GREAT JUSTICE!"
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]