Re: [Nautilus-list] Patch for Sawfish-workaround

[Gaute Lindkvist <lindkvis stud ntnu no>]

First. I'll keep your comments in mind the next time I'm submitting a
patch :).

> It seems a bad hack to be doing this, rather than not marking the window
> transient in the first place.
>
> Also, is this the right place for this check? Are all the dialogs in
> question using this function? This is the most serious issue for me. I don't
> want to put this workaround here and miss some dialogs that don't happen to
> use this function.

> But perhaps we can just require a newer Sawfish and avoid this altogether?

I think I'll wait with those fixes until you guys decide wether or not a
newer Sawfish should be required.
It would probably make sense to just fix Sawfish.

Gaute