Re: eel code freeze break request
- From: "Murray Cumming" <murrayc murrayc com>
- To: "Alexander Larsson" <alexl redhat com>
- Cc: "release-team gnome org" <release-team gnome org>, Dave Camp <dave ximian com>, Nautilus <nautilus-list gnome org>
- Subject: Re: eel code freeze break request
- Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2004 16:11:05 +0200 (CEST)
Approval 1 of 2. Thanks. I hope that lots of testers reported this.
> When you add or remove new applications to the open with property page
> in nautilus the new application doesn't appear/disappear until you close
> and reopen the page. The following patch fixes this, and removes some
> spew:
>
> Index: eel/eel-mime-application-chooser.c
> ===================================================================
> RCS file: /cvs/gnome/eel/eel/eel-mime-application-chooser.c,v
> retrieving revision 1.3
> diff -u -p -r1.3 eel-mime-application-chooser.c
> --- eel/eel-mime-application-chooser.c 23 Jul 2004 16:20:18 -0000 1.3
> +++ eel/eel-mime-application-chooser.c 31 Aug 2004 13:57:10 -0000
> @@ -282,16 +282,11 @@ static void
> mime_monitor_data_changed_cb (GnomeVFSMIMEMonitor *monitor,
> gpointer user_data)
> {
> -#if 0
> EelMimeApplicationChooser *chooser;
> -
> +
> chooser = EEL_MIME_APPLICATION_CHOOSER (user_data);
>
> - g_print ("refreshing model\n");
> -
> refresh_model (chooser);
> - g_print ("done refreshing the model\n");
> -#endif
> }
>
> static void
> Index: eel/eel-mime-extensions.c
> ===================================================================
> RCS file: /cvs/gnome/eel/eel/eel-mime-extensions.c,v
> retrieving revision 1.4
> diff -u -p -r1.4 eel-mime-extensions.c
> --- eel/eel-mime-extensions.c 12 Aug 2004 11:50:18 -0000 1.4
> +++ eel/eel-mime-extensions.c 31 Aug 2004 13:57:10 -0000
> @@ -163,9 +163,7 @@ mime_update_program_done (GPid pid,
> /* FIXME: what is the right thing to do here?? We're going to
> * have to rethink the gnome-vfs APIs.
> */
> - g_print ("updating the database\n");
> gnome_vfs_mime_reload ();
> - g_print ("done updating\n");
> }
> }
>
> The patch is interesting in that it mostly removes an "#if 0" statement.
> I'm not sure why it was there at all. It was in the initial checking by
> dave, but he has no idea why its there either.
Murray Cumming
murrayc murrayc com
www.murrayc.com
www.openismus.com
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]