Re: [RFC/PATCH] inotify -- a dnotify replacement

From: Jörn Engel <joern wohnheim fh-wedel de>
To: John McCutchan <ttb tentacle dhs org>
Cc: nautilus-list gnome org, Chris Wedgwood <cw f00f org>, linux-kernel vger kernel org
Subject: Re: [RFC/PATCH] inotify -- a dnotify replacement
Date: Wed, 12 May 2004 14:38:59 +0200

On Mon, 10 May 2004 18:17:40 -0400, John McCutchan wrote:
> 
> I now use ino_t and dev_t , though in struct inode, i_no is unsigned
> long?

Correct.  That definition should be changed as well, I just didn't
care enough to submit a patch yet.  Anyway, old mistakes never justify
new mistakes.

Jörn

-- 
People will accept your ideas much more readily if you tell them
that Benjamin Franklin said it first.
-- unknown

References:
- [RFC/PATCH] inotify -- a dnotify replacement
  - From: John McCutchan
- Re: [RFC/PATCH] inotify -- a dnotify replacement
  - From: Chris Wedgwood
- Re: [RFC/PATCH] inotify -- a dnotify replacement
  - From: John McCutchan

[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]