Perhaps Expocity could help Ctrl+Q-dependent users. Whatever happend to Expocity anyway? El jue, 27-05-2004 a las 09:48, Jason Tackaberry escribió: > On Thu, 2004-05-27 at 13:03 +0100, Jamie McCracken wrote: > > However from an end user point of view I would argue that these > > different modes appear as different applications and therefore it would > > be appropriate for Ctrl+Q to be used to close all spatial windows (and > > likewise the "Close All Windows" in the browser mode could also use > > Ctrl+Q for consistency). > > I think ctrl-q makes sense with the above behaviour only if it's really > true that users typically consider spatial windows and browser windows > as distinctly separate groups (or "applications," if you will). Given > that you can launch a browser window from a spatial window (right click > | Browser Folder), I'm not sure if this is true. A user might expect > ctrl-q to close all "file management" windows she opened. > > Ctrl-Q has the expected behaviour of "make all windows for this > application go away," but Nautilus is a weird case. As far as I'm > concerned, I like the idea of Nautilus having a ctrl-q, and having it > behave as you describe above (ctrl-q applies separately to spatial and > browser windows) would suit my use just fine, but I don't know if that's > what a typical user would expect. > > We may never know either without user testing. I think a safe > compromise would be to pick another shortcut to close all spatial > windows, and not worry about a similar option for browser windows. > > Cheers, > Jason. > > (I am not a usability expert.) > > ______________________________________________________________________ > -- > nautilus-list mailing list > nautilus-list gnome org > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/nautilus-list -- Manuel Amador (Rudd-O) GPG key ID: 0xC1033CAD at keyserver.net
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Esta parte del mensaje =?ISO-8859-1?Q?est=E1?= firmada digitalmente