Re: another crasher blocker bug in sight
- From: guenther <guenther rudersport de>
- To: nautilus-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: another crasher blocker bug in sight
- Date: Sun, 12 Nov 2006 17:53:12 +0100
Welcome to bugsquad hell.
> can somebody please take a look at
> http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=373730 and
> http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=372471 ?
> (probably the same issue.)
>
> pretty new bug (filed four days ago), 42 duplicates in four days (and
> that's why i'm posting to this list - this is another blocker rising
> up), and all duplicates coming from Fedora Core 6.
>
> CRITICAL **: nautilus_directory_ref: assertion
> `NAUTILUS_IS_DIRECTORY (directory)' failed
Also see bug 373294 [1]. Fedora only (yet?), same assertion. More than
40 reports in a whopping 2 days.
Note that both these bugs have been added to the auto-stacktrace-reject
list. This is a counter measure to stop the flood. However, please note
that this effectively means there will be no new duplicates, which
limits the ability to ask for more info and better traces. If you do
need this, feel free to contact me directly.
No new duplicates does *not* mean this bug to be magically fixed.
Due to the enormous workload such duplicate magnets are to the bugsquad,
these bugs should stay on the reject list. However, I can easily respond
to each new (rejected) duplicate with a custom mail, asking for a better
stacktrace, if need be.
...guenther
[1] http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=373294
--
char *t="\10pse\0r\0dtu\0 ghno\x4e\xc8\x79\xf4\xab\x51\x8a\x10\xf4\xf4\xc4";
main(){ char h,m=h=*t++,*x=t+2*h,c,i,l=*x,s=0; for (i=0;i<l;i++){ i%8? c<<=1:
(c=*++x); c&128 && (s+=h); if (!(h>>=1)||!t[s+h]){ putchar(t[s]);h=m;s=0; }}}
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]