Re: questions regarding two Nautilus issues people report frequently
- From: Jürg Billeter <j bitron ch>
- To: Christian Neumair <cneumair gnome org>
- Cc: nautilus-list <nautilus-list gnome org>
- Subject: Re: questions regarding two Nautilus issues people report frequently
- Date: Mon, 07 Apr 2008 13:57:14 +0200
On Mon, 2008-04-07 at 01:22 +0200, Christian Neumair wrote:
> I think intuititvely file operations should be perceived like:
> * duplicate: file A -> file B, A:B=1:1
> * copy = duplicate [target being in another folder]
> * move = copy + delete original = duplicate A to B + rename B + delete
> file A
>
> And these semantics are actually provided by Nautilus 2.20 and earlier -
> I do not remember a single complaint.
I fully agree. I'm not conviced at all by the argument that "cp does the
same". That's like saying we can't copy directories in nautilus just
because cp without -r can't copy directories, either. In my opinion,
copying files in nautilus should be like cp --archive, i.e. it should
preserve symlinks, mtime, permissions, and copy directories recursively.
Jürg
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]