Re: Specifying thumbnailers as a service
- From: "Brian J. Tarricone" <bjt23 cornell edu>
- To: Philip Van Hoof <spam pvanhoof be>
- Cc: nautilus-list gnome org, Lubos Lunak <l lunak suse cz>, kfm-devel kde org, strigi-devel lists sourceforge net, jens gnome org, xdg lists freedesktop org, olivier lx student wau nl, Tracker mailing list <tracker-list gnome org>
- Subject: Re: Specifying thumbnailers as a service
- Date: Mon, 1 Sep 2008 09:53:48 -0700
On Mon, 01 Sep 2008 10:49:31 +0200 Philip Van Hoof wrote:
> I think canceling is overkill. Making a thumbnail doesn't take longer
> than a minute (and a minute is an extreme case). Users don't cancel
> that.
Strongly disagree. I have a laptop, and say I'm on battery power. If
I'm scrolling through a big list of images in my file manager, and it's
requesting thumbnails, they all get queued. Say I find the file I want
near the end of the list (by file name, not thumbnail) and close the
file manager window... but the thumbnail service keeps chugging along,
uselessly creating thumbnails for 10s or 100s of files, pegging the CPU
and wasting my battery life. I wouldn't be particularly happy about
that.
Cancellation could be easily implemented by returning an ID from the
Create request that can be used to cancel the operation. On the daemon
side, canceling the request could be as easy as killing a subprocess,
depending on implementation...
-brian
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]