Re: How to set up "wireless repeater" with Network Manager 0.7?
- From: Jacob Beard <jbeard4 cs mcgill ca>
- To: Marc Herbert <Marc Herbert gmail com>
- Cc: networkmanager-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: How to set up "wireless repeater" with Network Manager 0.7?
- Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2009 10:09:14 -0400
Hi Herbert,
You're right, generally a "repeater" implies a Layer 2 construct,
and I am certainly trying to use NetworkManager to create a layer 3
NAT. I used the term "repeater", because it seemed the most concise
way to explain what my goals were, however I probably should have just
said: to share internet from one wireless card to another via a layer
3 NAT, using NetworkManager to configure the NAT. From now on, I'll
call the "repeater" a "router" as that seems to imply Layer 3 NAT.
Given that the connection sharing fails in the way I described (the
"repeater"/"router" nominating itself as nameserver, but failing to
forward DNS requests), should I file a bug report? If so, would it be
better to file it upstream, with you, or downstream, with my distro?
Finally, in terms of searching for a quick fix to work around this
probable bug, could anyone tell me if it is possible to configure the
nameservers that are served by NetworkManager via DHCP/dnsmasq?
Please let me know. Thanks,
Jake
On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 4:43 AM, Marc Herbert<Marc Herbert gmail com> wrote:
> Jacob Beard a écrit :
>> Hi,
>>
>> Sorry to spam the mailing list a bit, but I keep getting further into
>> this, and I want to be really clear about what I want. It seems like
>> there are two solutions to the problem of DNS not being shared
>> correctly on the repeater.
>>
>> The first possible solution is to diagnose why DNS is not forwarding correctly.
>>
>
> Hi Jacob,
>
> I think a "wireless repeater" is not the correct term here. With a real, layer 2 wireless repeater, you would not have to worry about forwarding DNS nor any other network configuration issues.
>
> I think you are just asking NM to setup a layer 3 NAT (typically call "connection sharing"). NATs do not care a bit whether layer 2 interfaces are wired versus not. If NetworkManager makes such a difference, then you just found a bug in NetworkManager.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Marc
>
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]