Re: [RFC] Dell Activity LED daemon and udev rule
- From: Bob Rodgers <Robert_Rodgers dell com>
- To: Ken Murray <kmurray gmail com>
- Cc: "Brown, Michael E" <Michael_E_Brown Dell com>, "Davis, Louis" <Louis_Davis Dell com>, "networkmanager-list gnome org" <networkmanager-list gnome org>, "Dailey, Jim" <Jim_Dailey Dell com>
- Subject: Re: [RFC] Dell Activity LED daemon and udev rule
- Date: Mon, 08 Mar 2010 15:09:14 -0600
On 3/5/2010 2:07 PM, Ken Murray wrote:
> On 5 March 2010 11:48, Bob Rodgers <Robert_Rodgers dell com> wrote:
>
>> Here are the two approaches mentioned:
>> 1 Daemon:
>> + only runs on demand on applicable machines
>> - approx 8MB memory usage for python daemon, possibly much less for a C/Glib daemon
>>
>> 2 Dispatcher:
>> + only runs on demand
>> - possibly runs on machines where it isn't needed
>>
>> Do you have a preference with regard to which we should pursue?
>
> I would personally prefer option 1, especially if it can be
> implemented as a C/Glib daemon. I would be happy to help with the
> implementation but I don't own an applicable Dell machine.
>
>
Noted, Ken. Thanks for your input.
--
Bob
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]
