Re: Homenet
- From: Xen <xen dds nl>
 
- To: networkmanager-list gnome org
 
- Subject: Re: Homenet
 
- Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2016 16:37:43 +0100
 
Using an ULA (as long as it is stable) is really the same as ignoring 
the first 64 bits. Any number that never changes can be ignored in a 
computation, or ceases being a variable in that sense (quite literally).
Op 22-3-2016 om 16:17 schreef Xen:
Meaning, he wants his router to generate an ULA and use that for all 
hostname resolution within the network. That also seems to imply that 
any addressing from the outside (the mobile device moving across 
borders) is not going to work when it uses a hostname.
That would imply that addressing in the home should not even USE the 
first 64 bit of the address field. That in turn would imply that the 
network should only have one (external) prefix, or that addressing 
from the outside using that prefix should be uniquely resolvable at 
all times, which means that if different prefixes ARE used, the 
internal host part should still be unique.
[
Date Prev][
Date Next]   [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]   
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]