Re: ANNOUNCE: Linux Kernel ORB: kORBit
- From: Michael Rothwell <rothwell holly-springs nc us>
- To: Alexander Viro <viro math psu edu>
- Cc: Alan Cox <alan lxorguk ukuu org uk>, Chris Lattner <sabre nondot org>, Jamie Lokier <lk tantalophile demon co uk>, "Mohammad A. Haque" <mhaque haque net>, Ben Ford <ben kalifornia com>, linux-kernel vger kernel org, orbit-list gnome org, korbit-cvs lists sourceforge net
- Subject: Re: ANNOUNCE: Linux Kernel ORB: kORBit
- Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2000 21:53:41 -0500
Alexander Viro wrote:
> p9fs exists. I didn't see these patches since August, but probably I can poke
> Roman into porting it to the current tree. 9P is quite simple and unlike
> CORBA it had been designed for taking kernel stuff to userland. Besides,
> authors definitely understand UNIX...
I would side with Viro here. Just as we would all cringe if MSFT added
COM/ActiveX support to the NT kernel, us Unix folks cringe at the
thought of adding CORBA to the kernel. However, that doesn't mean that
we dislike the idea of exporting kernel services and interfaces for use
in userland. And Plan9 seems to have some rather elegant and efficient
methods for doing that. In Plan9, everything really is a file! It's as
if they got a chance to do Unix again, and they did it consistently this
time.
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]