Re: orbit 1/2 interoperation

[Havoc Pennington <hp redhat com>]

Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@noisehavoc.org> writes: 
> Would there be any problem with using oaf_orb_get or
> bonobo_activation_orb_get even if you don't use the oaf/b-a activation
> mechanism? That should alleviate any concerns about duplicating the
> code, and would avoid the need to fix any bugs that crop up in it in
> gconf as well.

Not really, I do that in the stable branch to avoid breakage and I
have to link to OAF anyway. It just makes me cringe a bit to link to a
library to get 30 or 40 lines of code. Seems braindamaged.

Havoc