Re: [G2R] heads up on 84897 and dependencies

[Michael Meeks <michael ximian com>]

Argh,

On Sat, 2002-06-15 at 09:29, Bill Haneman wrote:
> After some soul-searching, I think we should remove the oneway
> directive.  Since we should then remove the ref() and the requirement
> for the called server to unref() after servicing the call, this will
> require changes to apps using our API (currently only apps under our
> direct control, and GOK and gnopernicus).  However this means that.
> despite bincompatibility, if we do this we should do it at 2.0.0 (i.e.
> *now*) and not 2.0.1.

	Argh - I realize now that this is correct; fuzzy thinking before. There
will need to be API changes to AT's stuff.

	I'd still go for shipping Gnome 2.0.0 now, with an Errata statement -
that a11y event propagation will change for 2.0.1.

	Regards,

		Michael.

-- 
 mmeeks@gnu.org  <><, Pseudo Engineer, itinerant idiot