Re: [Planner Dev] Roadmap for 1.0
- From: Richard Hult <richard imendio com>
- To: Planner Project Manager - Development List <planner-dev lists imendio com>
- Subject: Re: [Planner Dev] Roadmap for 1.0
- Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2003 10:07:26 +0100
tor 2003-12-11 klockan 00.48 skrev Malcolm Tredinnick:
> On Thu, 2003-12-11 at 10:31, Richard Hult wrote:
> [...]
> > Bascially, I think that we need to get the basic functionality done,
> > release 1.0, and then take it from there. That means that more advanced
> > topics like a project server will be out of scope here.
> >
> > So, here comes a list, smaller and larger items somewhat mixed:
> >
> > * Undo/redo: this is a must-have. I've started working on it
> > * Implement the remaining types of task constraints:
> > start-to-finish, start-to-start, finish-to-finish
>
> I have a long plane flight coming up next week (Sunday), so if nobody
> else sings out, I will try to have a look at this one then. Every time I
> make a project plan with Planner I want to use something other than
> finish-to-start somewhere.
That would rock! We could also implement one or two and remove the other
ones if that makes sense (not sure all are really useful?)
> > * Zoom and date range options for printing
> > * Remember print settings
> > * Use libgda for the database support
> > * Up to date, complete userguide
> > * Usability improvements to the gantt chart (move tasks with the
> > mouse, context-menu for gantt bars, etc
>
> Along similar lines: I seem to regularly need to edit something via the
> tasks menu and it would be nice that when I flip back to the Gantt view
> if the highlighted item was the one I have highlighted in the Tasks
> view. To me this seems logical -- highlighting the same data element in
> both views. Do other people have strong feelings?
Personally, I think it could be a good idea.
> I am almost volunteering to look at this (again because it fixes a
> problem I care about), but I don't want to spend time if it has some
> clear drawback and is unlikely to be accepted.
>
> > * Project template files (nice and useful project examples)
> > * OpenOffice spreadsheet export. There is an XSL stylesheet for
> > this, just needs to be hooked up
> > * Other export/import filters? Gnumeric comes to mind, and simple
> > CSV text export
>
> Are there any standards in this area that people know about? What I am
> asking is whether the existing spreadsheet export stylesheet just uses a
> style that looks reasonable, or are we emulating something that exists
> in Microsoft Project or another tool?
I think the main point is to actually get the data in a kind of raw and
easy-to-use fashion, without a lot of "fluff". I don't think there is a
standard or semi-standard for this, but we could take a look at the
output from MS Project and see if it's something worth copying.
> > * Finish the "Time table view" (we need a better name), displays a
> > resource centric gantt like chart, Xavier has started looking at
> > this
>
> "Resource utilisation" sounds nearly as bad, but that is what I kept
> thinking of it as when this was originally being worked on. "Resource
> usage", maybe? "Resource scheduling"?
Resource usage sounds pretty good to me.
Regards,
Richard
--
Richard Hult richard imendio com
Imendio http://www.imendio.com
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]