Re: [Planner Dev] libplanner API change proposal

[Jani tiainen <redetin luukku com>]

Richard Hult wrote:

> On tor, 2004-08-12 at 07:40 +0300, Jani tiainen wrote:
>
>
> > Good convention. I was wondering same things while messing with Windows 
> > port. You never know do you have to free it, or better not to free...
>
>
> Yep, I think Alvaros's suggestion is good, we already use it in some
> parts of the API.
>
>
> > In same change I would recommend dropping out those "mrp" prefixes.
>
>
> Those are there for a reason, namely to indiciate that they are part of
> libplanner and not an internal function or part of a view or plugin etc.
> Using a namespace is a good thing, so we shouldn't change that.

Sorry, meant that replace those mrp prefixes... for eg. plib or 
something more appropriate, mrp still reminds me "MrProject". (What I 
was thinking while writing that one...)

--

Jani Tiainen