Re: [Planner Dev] Planner - Suggestion for Deliverable or Objective view.



I think I've misremembered the press release, so please I retract that
statement.  Sorry about that.

I'm going to ask in #evolution, since I hate it when something pops into
"memory" like that.

-Brian 

On Wed, 2004-07-14 at 18:34 -0400, Charles Tryon wrote:
> On Wed, 2004-07-14 at 11:24, Brian P. Skahan wrote:
> > On Mon, 2004-07-12 at 11:14 +0000, Alvaro del Castillo wrote:
> > ... Remember that Evolution
> > > doesn't have a port to Windows, ...
> > 
> > I believe Evolution 2.0 will run on windows.  
> 
>   I'm curious where you've heard this, or if it is definitely in the
> plans now.  I was doing some Googling, and while there are a lot of
> people ASKING for a Windows port, and a number of theories on how it
> could be done, I didn't see any indication that it was actually taking
> place.  Of course, now that Novel owns Ximian, a lot of things could be
> changing.
> 
>   (It'd be nice to be able to run both Evolution and Planner on Windows,
> but we've already been around that barn a couple of times...)
> 

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part



[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]