Re: [Planner Dev] First calendar undo patch
- From: Alvaro del Castillo <acs lambdaux com>
- To: Richard Hult <richard imendio com>
- Cc: Planner Dev <planner-dev lists imendio com>
- Subject: Re: [Planner Dev] First calendar undo patch
- Date: Thu, 17 Jun 2004 16:36:04 +0000
Hi!
El jue, 17-06-2004 a las 13:06, Richard Hult escribió:
> On tor, 2004-06-17 at 07:37 +0000, Alvaro del Castillo wrote:
> > Hi!
> >
> > El mié, 16-06-2004 a las 08:20, Richard Hult escribió:
> > > On tis, 2004-06-15 at 05:16 +0000, Alvaro del Castillo wrote:
> > > > Hi guys!
> > > >
> > > > Here goes the fresh new patch for the calendar editor, this one for the
> > > > calendar day type editor.
> > >
> > > Looks good as usual :)
> > >
> > > It's probably a good idea to start with creation and deletion of
> > > calendars though since I'm afraid that it might end up like for tasks
> > > otherwise, that we need to redo the work (remember the ID stuff we
> > > almost did? :)
> > >
> >
> > Hmmm, I am not sure I am following you, maybe because I haven't looked
> > to creation and deletion of calendars.
>
> Say for example that we remove a calendar, and keep a reference to it in
> a command in a way that doesn't work when the calendar is inserted again
> with a redo operation. Things like this that bit us when we first did
> the task undo stuff. I'm not sure that we will have any problems but I
> think it's a good idea to start in that area this time around to be
> safe.
>
Hmm, we haven't used ids in all the undo code and it works now
correctly. I think calendar shouldn't be different in this way and if we
finally do all the object_id stuff, we will need to do it in all the
undo code. Actually, I will try to follow the same way we have used
until now.
> > > What do you think?
> >
> > I will start trying to do it to find the problems :)
> >
> > About the ID stuff, it seems we will need it for the datase
> > identification of componentes and access control to objetcs from
> > different people and version control, but we will see ;-)
>
> Sure, but we still don't want to redo all the undo code :)
>
Yes, but I am not sure that we have the same needs in versioning in
objects for concurrency and undo code.
Cheers
> /Richard
--
Alvaro del Castillo San Félix
Lambdaux Software Services S.R.L.
Universidad Rey Juan Carlos
Centro de Apoyo Tecnológico
C/ Tulipán sn 28933 Mostoles, Madrid-Spain
www.lambdaux.com
acs lambdaux com
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]