Re: [Planner Dev] Proposal to alter types of resources to own tables/elements (work=human or material and a human role and team)

["lincoln phipps openmutual net" <lincoln phipps openmutual net>]

Richard Hult wrote:
> On lör, 2004-05-01 at 07:53 +0100, lincoln phipps openmutual net wrote:
>
> > Been thinking about how the current scheme in Planner
> > has a number of places that have humans created with their
> > attributes (email, phone etc) as manager roles and which
> > I feel should be brought into their own class.
>
>
> We definitely need to work on the resource handling in Planner, but any
> larger changes will be post-1.0.

OK - probably right for post 1.0 as its a sizable change.
> For now, I'd like to focus on the low hanging fruit that we can fix for
> 1.0, perhaps like having fixed cost and things like that for resources.
> Any ideas in that area?

My current bugzillas on resources and costs are,

Add multi-currency support for resource costs....
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=138935

Resource costs should have a per-use cost value....
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=138936

Resource costs should be more flexible on time period...
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=140252

and can't actually think of anything else to do on that
other than we should look at implementing the standard (as
it is now) and overtime rates (this isn't bugzilla'd) .
We'll never get a perfect implementation of the wide variety
of how much people cost (i.e. weekend v. holiday v. special
holidays v. T+1/2 or double time or shift allowances ....)
so the two rates + fixed rate will suffice.

Lincoln.

> /Richard
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Planner-dev mailing list
> Planner-dev lists imendio com
> http://lists.imendio.com/mailman/listinfo/planner-dev