Re: [Planner Dev] Proposal for new features: screenshot

[Richard Hult <richard imendio com>]

Hi,

Kurt Maute wrote:
> On Tue, 2006-01-10 at 10:57 +0100, Matteo Nastasi wrote:
> 
> 
>>The idea behind is a little bit different, i would tell to the user
>>"how much time is stealed from other (vampire) tasks", not "when 
>>resources works at task"; delta = (work made / work expected) where 
>>"work expected" is the work of all resources that are
>>at work in a particular day (example of yogi and bubu at day 12: bubu
>>not work but the totality of the working resources of the task
>>"sleeping" (yogi ;) ar working).
> 
> 
> ok, I see your logic.  I still don't necessarily agree, but I can live
> with it.  ;-)
> 
> 
>>>I second Richards opinion that working with shading the bar would be
>>>more more clear to the user.
>>
>>Sorry, about this point I'm a little stubborn ;) for 2 reasons: 
>>  1) old symbols are more understandible then new symbols
>>
>>  2) I add 4 new concepts not only "not standard not working day" about
>>     working/not working days: 
>>     . some resource of a task not work in a working day
>>     . all resources of a task not work in a working day
>>     . some resource of a task work in a not working day (white band
>>       under the task)
>>     . all resources of a task work in a not working day (white bands
>>       upper and under the task - day 10, task "to steal honey" in the
>>       screenshot example).
>>
>>With your method I don't understand how:
>>  1) sign partial ferial of some resource assigned of a task
>>  2) sign work on not working days

OK, that makes sense. But is there a way to make it a bit more clear
than the very thin light line?

>>Ok, for me not problem about this point, what property I can "copy" for
>>implement it, view critical ?.
> 
> 
> Yes, that's a good one.

I'm not sure I agree, this is not strictly a view thing, it affects the
way the schedule is calculated... or am I confused? :)

/Richard

-- 
Imendio AB, http://www.imendio.com/